Re: [Interop-wg] [tc][qa][all]Potential New Interoperability Programs: The Current Thinking

Previous Topic Next Topic
classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
1 message Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view

Re: [Interop-wg] [tc][qa][all]Potential New Interoperability Programs: The Current Thinking

Egle Sigler-2
Thank you Mark for writing this up! If you are interested in new interop
programs, please comment on
In addition, we will also be discussing this during our weekly meeting on
Wednesday, 11:00 AM CST/ 16:00 UTC in #openstack-meeting-3. If you cannot
join us for the meeting at that time, find us in #openstack-interop

Thank you,


On 6/9/17, 3:55 PM, "Mark Voelker" <[hidden email]> wrote:

>Hi Everyone,
>Happy Friday!  There have been a number of discussions (at the PTG, at
>OpenStack Summit, in Interop WG and Board of Directors meetings, etc)
>over the past several months about the possibility of creating new
>interoperability programs in addition to the existing OpenStack Powered
>program administered by the Interop Working Group (formerly the DefCore
>Committee).  In particular, lately there have been a lot of discussions
>recently [1] about where to put tests associated with trademark programs
>with respect to some existing TC guidance [2] and community goals for
>Queens [3].  Although these potential new programs have been discussed in
>a number of places, it¹s a little hard to keep tabs on where we¹re at
>with them unless you¹re actively following the Interop WG.  Given the
>recent discussions on openstack-dev, I thought it might be useful to try
>and brain dump our current thinking on what these new programs might look
>like into a document somewhere that people could point at in discussions
>rather than discussing abstracts and working off memories from prior
>meetings.  To that end, I took a first stab at it this week which you can
>find here:
>Needless to say this is just a draft to try to get some of the ideas out
>of neurons and on to electrons, so please don¹t take it to be firm
>consensus‹rather consider it a draft of what we¹re currently thinking and
>an invitation to collaborate.  I expect that other members of the Interop
>Working Group will be leaving comments in Gerrit as we hash through this,
>and we¹d love to have input from other folks in the community as well.
>These programs potentially touch a lot of you (in fact, almost all of
>you) in some way or another, so we¹re happy to hear your input as we work
>on evolving the interop programs.  Quite a lot has happened over the past
>couple of years, so we hope this will help folks understand where we came
>from and think about whether we want to make changes going forward.
>By the way, for those of you who might find an HTML-rendered document
>easier to read, click on the "gate-interop-docs-ubuntu-xenial² link in
>the comments left by Jenkins and then on ³Extension Programs - Current
>Direction².  Thanks, and have a great weekend!
>At Your Service,
>Mark T. Voelker
>Interop-wg mailing list
>[hidden email]

OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: [hidden email]?subject:unsubscribe