Re: [nova][cinder] Is there interest in an admin-api to refresh volume connection info?

Previous Topic Next Topic
 
classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
2 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [nova][cinder] Is there interest in an admin-api to refresh volume connection info?

Saverio Proto
Hello Matt,

It is true that we are refreshing something that rarely changes. But
if you deliver a cloud service for several years, at one point you
might have to do these parameters changes.

Something that should not change rarely are the secrets of the ceph
users to talk to the ceph cluster. Good security would suggest
periodic secret rotation, but today this is not really feasible.

I know the problem is also that you cannot change stuff in libvirt
while the VMs are running. Maybe is time for a discussion with libvirt
developers to make our voice louder about required features ?

The goal would be to change on the fly the ceph/rbd secret that a VM
uses to access a volume, while the VM is running. I think this is very
important.

thank you

Saverio


2017-06-09 6:15 GMT+02:00 Matt Riedemann <[hidden email]>:

> On 6/8/2017 1:39 PM, melanie witt wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, 8 Jun 2017 08:58:20 -0500, Matt Riedemann wrote:
>>>
>>> Nova stores the output of the Cinder os-initialize_connection info API in
>>> the Nova block_device_mappings table, and uses that later for making volume
>>> connections.
>>>
>>> This data can get out of whack or need to be refreshed, like if your ceph
>>> server IP changes, or you need to recycle some secret uuid for your ceph
>>> cluster.
>>>
>>> I think the only ways to do this on the nova side today are via volume
>>> detach/re-attach, reboot, migrations, etc - all of which, except live
>>> migration, are disruptive to the running guest.
>>
>>
>> I believe the only way to work around this currently is by doing a 'nova
>> shelve' followed by a 'nova unshelve'. That will end up querying the
>> connection_info from Cinder and update the block device mapping record for
>> the instance. Maybe detach/re-attach would work too but I can't remember
>> trying it.
>
>
> Shelve has it's own fun set of problems like the fact it doesn't terminate
> the connection to the volume backend on shelve. Maybe that's not a problem
> for Ceph, I don't know. You do end up on another host though potentially,
> and it's a full delete and spawn of the guest on that other host. Definitely
> disruptive.
>
>>
>>> I've kicked around the idea of adding some sort of admin API interface
>>> for refreshing the BDM.connection_info on-demand if needed by an operator.
>>> Does anyone see value in this? Are operators doing stuff like this already,
>>> but maybe via direct DB updates?
>>>
>>> We could have something in the compute API which calls down to the
>>> compute for an instance and has it refresh the connection_info from Cinder
>>> and updates the BDM table in the nova DB. It could be an admin action API,
>>> or part of the os-server-external-events API, like what we have for the
>>> 'network-changed' event sent from Neutron which nova uses to refresh the
>>> network info cache.
>>>
>>> Other ideas or feedback here?
>>
>>
>> We've discussed this a few times before and we were thinking it might be
>> best to handle this transparently and just do a connection_info refresh +
>> record update inline with the request flows that will end up reading
>> connection_info from the block device mapping records. That way, operators
>> won't have to intervene when connection_info changes.
>
>
> The thing that sucks about this is if we're going to be refreshing something
> that maybe rarely changes for every volume-related operation on the
> instance. That seems like a lot of overhead to me (nova/cinder API
> interactions, Cinder interactions to the volume backend, nova-compute round
> trips to conductor and the DB to update the BDM table, etc).
>
>>
>> At least in the case of Ceph, as long as a guest is running, it will
>> continue to work fine if the monitor IPs or secrets change because it will
>> continue to use its existing connection to the Ceph cluster. Things go wrong
>> when an instance action such as resize, stop/start, or reboot is done
>> because when the instance is taken offline and being brought back up, the
>> stale connection_info is read from the block_device_mapping table and
>> injected into the instance, and so it loses contact with the cluster. If we
>> query Cinder and update the block_device_mapping record at the beginning of
>> those actions, the instance will get the new connection_info.
>>
>> -melanie
>>
>>
>
>
> --
>
> Thanks,
>
> Matt
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> OpenStack-operators mailing list
> [hidden email]
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators

_______________________________________________
OpenStack-operators mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [nova][cinder] Is there interest in an admin-api to refresh volume connection info?

Morgenstern, Chad
I have been studying how to perform failover operations with Cinder --failover.  Nova is not aware of the failover event. Being able to refresh the connection state especially for Nova would come in very handy, especially in admin level dr scenarios.

I'm attaching the blog I wrote on the subject:
http://netapp.io/2017/08/09/cinder-cheesecake-things-to-consider/


-----Original Message-----
From: Arne Wiebalck [mailto:[hidden email]]
Sent: Wednesday, September 13, 2017 11:53 AM
To: Matt Riedemann <[hidden email]>
Cc: [hidden email]; OpenStack Development Mailing List <[hidden email]>
Subject: Re: [Openstack-operators] [nova][cinder] Is there interest in an admin-api to refresh volume connection info?


> On 13 Sep 2017, at 16:52, Matt Riedemann <[hidden email]> wrote:
>
> On 9/13/2017 3:24 AM, Arne Wiebalck wrote:
>> I’m reviving this thread to check if the suggestion to address
>> potentially stale connection data by an admin command (or a scheduled
>> task) made it to the planning for one of the upcoming releases?
>
> It hasn't, but we're at the PTG this week so I can throw it on the list of topics.


That’d be great, thanks!

--
Arne Wiebalck
CERN IT

_______________________________________________
OpenStack-operators mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators
_______________________________________________
OpenStack-operators mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators